4.5 Article

MuSE: accounting for tumor heterogeneity using a sample-specific error model improves sensitivity and specificity in mutation calling from sequencing data

期刊

GENOME BIOLOGY
卷 17, 期 -, 页码 -

出版社

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1029-6

关键词

Somatic mutation calling; Sensitivity and specificity; Bayesian inference; Model-based cutoff finding; Next-generation sequencing

资金

  1. Keck Center of the Gulf Coast Consortia for the Computational Cancer Biology Training Program
  2. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) [RP140113]
  3. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [U24 CA143883 02S2]
  4. Integrative Pipeline for Analysis & Translational Application of TCGA Data [5U24CA143883-04]
  5. Cancer Prevention Research Institute of Texas [RP130090]
  6. NCI [1R01CA174206-01, P30 CA016672]
  7. US National Cancer Institute (NCI
  8. MD Anderson TCGA Genome Data Analysis Center) [CA143883, CA083639, CA183793]
  9. Cancer Prevention and Research Institute of Texas [R1205 01]
  10. UT Systems Stars Award [PS100149]
  11. Welch Foundation Robert A. Welch Distinguished University Chair Award [G-0040]
  12. MD Anderson Physician Scientist Award
  13. C.G. Johnson Advanced Scholar Award

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Subclonal mutations reveal important features of the genetic architecture of tumors. However, accurate detection of mutations in genetically heterogeneous tumor cell populations using next-generation sequencing remains challenging. We develop MuSE (http://bioinformatics.mdanderson.org/main/MuSE), Mutation calling using a Markov Substitution model for Evolution, a novel approach for modeling the evolution of the allelic composition of the tumor and normal tissue at each reference base. MuSE adopts a sample-specific error model that reflects the underlying tumor heterogeneity to greatly improve the overall accuracy. We demonstrate the accuracy of MuSE in calling subclonal mutations in the context of large-scale tumor sequencing projects using whole exome and whole genome sequencing.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据