4.7 Article

In situ measurement of stem water content and diurnal storage of an apricot tree with a high frequency inner fringing dielectric sensor

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 35-46

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.002

关键词

Inner fringing frequency domain sensor; Stem water content (StWC); Noninvasive stem water measurement; Stem water storage; Trees; Capacitance

资金

  1. Chinese-German Center for Scientific Promotion (Chinesisches-Deutsches Zentrum fuer Wissenschaftsfoerderung) [GZ1272]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31371543]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Stem water content (StWC) is a key parameter characterizing plant water relations. However, a reliable yet non-invasive method of determining StWC in trees has not been developed. Here we examined an inner fringing frequency domain (FD) sensor in a 12-year old apricot tree. Two strap rings operating at 100 MHz accurately measured StWC in stems 4-12 cm in diameter. Effective sensing depth (ESD) inside the stems, and the allowable maximum stem diameter (AMStD) were systematically evaluated. To determine ESD, a novel experimental method, stepwise stem core removal (SStCR), was developed, and combined with numerical simulation using a High Frequency Structure Simulator (HFSS). The experimental and analytical approaches were in good agreement, demonstrating that the ESD must include substantial sapwood. In apricot, with ring-porous distribution of xylem vessels, performance was excellent up to AMStD <= 8 cm following temperature correction. In the current study, we characterize diurnal patterns of water loss and recharge in stems of varying diameter, demonstrate hysteresis in water content between stems of different sizes and heights in the canopy, and evaluate potential interactions with ambient temperature fluctuations. The inner fringing FD sensor can be easily constructed at low cost, suggesting the potential for routine measurement of StWC in diverse woody plants.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据