4.7 Article

Estimates of rice lodging using indices derived from UAV visible and thermal infrared images

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 252, 期 -, 页码 144-154

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2018.01.021

关键词

Rice lodging; Visible light-based imaging; Support vector machine; Thermal infrared imaging; Unmanned aerial vehicle

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31701355]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0300405]
  3. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M60048]
  4. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  5. science and technology plan project of Yangzhou [YZ2016251]
  6. Jiangsu Agricultural Industry Technology System

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Rice lodging not only causes difficulty in harvest operations, but also drastically reduces yield. Rice lodging assessment contributes greatly to rice plantation and crop field management. In this study, we collected visible and thermal infrared images with an unmanned aerial vehicle. Then, based on hybrid image analysis and field investigation, we established a comprehensive rice lodging recognition model using a particle swarm optimization and support vector machine algorithm. The results showed that color and texture features were different between lodged and non-lodged rice plants. Moreover, the temperature was distinct between lodging and non lodging areas, with lodged rice having higher canopy temperature. The developed model based on the visible and thermal infrared images was validated using different Indica and Japonica rice cultivars. The model had a false positives rate and false negatives rate of less than 10%, and estimated lodging rate with an R-2 greater than 0.9. These results indicated that combination of visible and thermal infrared images feature significantly increased the rice lodging recognition accuracy. The developed model can be used to monitor rice lodging and estimate the lodging rate.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据