4.7 Article

Diel ecosystem conductance response to vapor pressure deficit is suboptimal and independent of soil moisture

期刊

AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY
卷 250, 期 -, 页码 24-34

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2017.12.078

关键词

Stomatal conductance; Ecosystem conductance; VPD; GPP; Soil moisture

资金

  1. CDIAC
  2. ICOS Ecosystem Thematic Center
  3. China Scholarship Council
  4. Department of Energy GO-AMAZON funding
  5. USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) Foundational Program [2017-67013-26253]
  6. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91647212]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Ecosystem conductance, which describes ecosystem regulation of water and carbon exchange and links plant functions with the environment, is a critical component in ecosystem and earth system models. However, the behaviors of ecosystem conductance at the ecosystem level and its responses to environmental conditions are still largely unclear. In this study, half-hourly data of 77 eddy-covariance sites from the FLUXNET2015 dataset were used to compare four ecosystem conductance models at the ecosystem level and determine the most consistent vapor pressure deficit (VPD) dependence across plant functional types for varying soil moisture stress levels at the subdaily time scale. We used leaf-level VPD (VPDl), a better indicator of atmospheric dryness at the leaf level, for canopy-level analysis instead of measured atmospheric VPD. Detection of the best-fitted exponent of VPDl indicates that ecosystem conductance responds to VPD between optimality-theory (i.e., VPD-0.5 dependence) and Leuning's (i.e., VPD-1 dependence) models. Accounting for different soil moisture stress levels only affected minimum ecosystem conductance and did not affect the exponent and factor of VPDl indicating limited diurnal soil moisture-VPDl interactions. These results indicate limited interaction between xylem and stomata at subdaily time scales and that soil moisture effects can be simplified as a regulation of minimum (soil plus canopy) conductance.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据