4.7 Article

Redshift distributions of galaxies in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification shear catalogue and implications for weak lensing

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
卷 94, 期 4, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.94.042005

关键词

-

资金

  1. European Research Council [240672]
  2. DFG Cluster of Excellence Origin and Structure of the Universe
  3. U.S. Department of Energy
  4. U.S. National Science Foundation
  5. Ministry of Science and Education of Spain
  6. Science and Technology Facilities Council of the United Kingdom
  7. Higher Education Funding Council for England
  8. National Center for Supercomputing Applications at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  9. Kavli Institute of Cosmological Physics at the University of Chicago
  10. Center for Cosmology and Astro-Particle Physics at the Ohio State University
  11. Mitchell Institute for Fundamental Physics and Astronomy at Texas AM University
  12. Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
  13. Fundacao Carlos Chagas Filho de Amparo a Pesquisa do Estado do Rio de Janeiro
  14. Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico
  15. Ministerio da Ciencia e Tecnologia
  16. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
  17. National Science Foundation [AST-1138766]
  18. MINECO [AYA2012-39559, ESP2013-48274, FPA2013-47986]
  19. Centro de Excelencia Severo Ochoa [SEV-2012-0234]
  20. ERDF funds from the European Union
  21. Argonne National Laboratory
  22. University of California at Santa Cruz
  23. University of Cambridge
  24. Centro de Investigaciones Energeticas, Medioambientales y Tecnologicas-Madrid
  25. University of Chicago
  26. University College London
  27. DES-Brazil Consortium
  28. Eidgenossische Technische Hochschule (ETH) Zurich
  29. Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory
  30. University of Edinburgh
  31. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign
  32. Institut de Ciencies de l'Espai (IEEC/CSIC)
  33. Institut de Fisica d'Altes Energies
  34. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory
  35. Ludwig-Maximilians Universitat and the associated Excellence Cluster Universe
  36. University of Michigan
  37. National Optical Astronomy Observatory
  38. University of Nottingham
  39. Ohio State University
  40. University of Pennsylvania
  41. University of Portsmouth
  42. SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory, Stanford University
  43. University of Sussex
  44. Texas AM University
  45. Australian Astronomical Observatory [A/2013B/012]
  46. Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for All-sky Astrophysics (CAASTRO) [CE110001020]
  47. Swiss National Science Foundation [200021_14944, 200021_143906]
  48. Alfred P. Sloan Foundation
  49. National Science Foundation
  50. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science
  51. University of Arizona
  52. Brazilian Participation Group
  53. Brookhaven National Laboratory
  54. Carnegie Mellon University
  55. University of Florida
  56. French Participation Group
  57. German Participation Group
  58. Harvard University
  59. Instituto de Astrofisica de Canarias
  60. Michigan State/Notre Dame/JINA Participation Group
  61. Johns Hopkins University
  62. Max Planck Institute for Astrophysics
  63. Max Planck Institute for Extraterrestrial Physics
  64. New Mexico State University
  65. New York University
  66. Pennsylvania State University
  67. Princeton University
  68. Spanish Participation Group
  69. University of Tokyo
  70. University of Utah
  71. Vanderbilt University
  72. University of Virginia
  73. University of Washington
  74. Yale University
  75. ESO Telescopes at the La Silla Paranal Observatory [179.A-2004, 177.A-3016]
  76. STFC [ST/H001581/1, ST/M003574/1, ST/I000976/1, ST/M004708/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/N000668/1, ST/M005305/1, ST/N001087/1, ST/L006529/1, ST/L000768/1, ST/L000652/1, ST/M001334/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  77. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [200021_143906] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)
  78. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/M004708/1, ST/K00090X/1, ST/N000668/1, 1244451, ST/M001334/1, ST/L000768/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  79. UK Space Agency [ST/K003135/1, ST/N002679/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  80. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  81. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1311924, 1536171] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  82. Division Of Physics
  83. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1125897] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  84. ICREA Funding Source: Custom

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We present photometric redshift estimates for galaxies used in the weak lensing analysis of the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification (DES SV) data. Four model-or machine learning-based photometric redshift methods-ANNZ2, BPZ calibrated against BCC-Ufig simulations, SKYNET, and TPZ-are analyzed. For training, calibration, and testing of these methods, we construct a catalogue of spectroscopically confirmed galaxies matched against DES SV data. The performance of the methods is evaluated against the matched spectroscopic catalogue, focusing on metrics relevant for weak lensing analyses, with additional validation against COSMOS photo-z's. From the galaxies in the DES SV shear catalogue, which have mean redshift 0.72 +/- 0.01 over the range 0.3 < z < 1.3, we construct three tomographic bins with means of z = {0.45; 0.67; 1.00}. These bins each have systematic uncertainties delta z <= 0.05 in the mean of the fiducial SKYNET photo-z (dz). We propagate the errors in the redshift distributions through to their impact on cosmological parameters estimated with cosmic shear, and find that they cause shifts in the value of sigma(8) of approximately 3%. This shift is within the one sigma statistical errors on sigma(8) for the DES SV shear catalogue. We further study the potential impact of systematic differences on the critical surface density, Sigma(crit), finding levels of bias safely less than the statistical power of DES SV data. We recommend a final Gaussian prior for the photo-z bias in the mean of n(z) of width 0.05 for each of the three tomographic bins, and show that this is a sufficient bias model for the corresponding cosmology analysis.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据