4.5 Article

Proteins involved in focal adhesion signaling pathways are differentially regulated in experimental branch retinal vein occlusion

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL EYE RESEARCH
卷 138, 期 -, 页码 87-95

出版社

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.exer.2015.06.011

关键词

Retina; Branch retinal vein occlusion; Proteomics; Mass spectrometry; Biological marker; Integrin; Lipocalin; Osteopontin; Myosin 9; Adhesion; Extracellular matrix

资金

  1. Svend Andersen Foundation
  2. Bagger-Sorensen Foundation
  3. Obel Family Foundation
  4. Herta Christensen Foundation
  5. North Denmark Region [2013-0076797]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Branch retinal vein occlusion (BRVO) is a common retinal vascular disease, but global protein changes following the condition remain largely unelucidated. To bring new insights into pathological processes and identify potential therapeutic targets, large-scale retinal protein changes following BRVO were studied by combining a porcine model of experimental BRVO with proteomic analysis by label-free liquid chromatography mass spectrometry. Among a total set of 1974 proteins, 52 significantly upregulated proteins and 10 significantly downregulated proteins were identified in retinas with BRVO after 15 days. Significantly upregulated proteins were involved in signaling pathways of focal adhesion via integrin and blood coagulation. Proteins involved in focal adhesion signaling included collagen alpha-2 chain, laminin subunit beta-2, laminin subunit gamma-1, lipocalin-7, nidogen-2, osteopontin, integrin-beta, alpha-actinin-1, isoform 2 of alpha-actinin-1, talin-2 and filamin C. The identified proteins indicate that BRVO was associated with extracellular matrix remodeling processes. The present study identified focal adhesion signaling and ECM remodeling as important biological mechanisms to evaluate in the search for signaling pathways that promote neovascularisation and macular edema following BRVO. (C) 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据