4.2 Article

The MMSE and MoCA for Screening Cognitive Impairment in Less Educated Patients with Parkinson's Disease

期刊

JOURNAL OF MOVEMENT DISORDERS
卷 9, 期 3, 页码 152-159

出版社

KOREAN MOVEMENT DISORDERS SOC
DOI: 10.14802/jmd.16020

关键词

Mini-Mental State Examination; Montreal Cognitive Assessment; Parkinson's disease; dementia; mild cognitive impairment

资金

  1. Original Technology Research Program for Brain Science through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Korean government (MSIP) [2014M3C7A1064752]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective To explore whether the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) and Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) can be used to screen for dementia or mild cognitive impairment (MCI) in less educated patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Methods We reviewed the medical records of PD patients who had taken the Korean MMSE (K-MMSE), Korean MoCA (K-MoCA), and comprehensive neuropsychological tests. Predictive values of the K-MMSE and K-MoCA for dementia or MCI were analyzed in groups divided by educational level. Results The discriminative powers of the K-MMSE and K-MoCA were excellent [area under the curve (AUC) 0.86-0.97] for detecting dementia but not for detecting MCI (AUC 0.64-0.85). The optimal screening cutoff values of both tests increased with educational level for dementia (K-MMSE < 15 for illiterate, < 20 for 0.5-3 years of education, < 23 for 4-6 years, < 25 for 7-9 years, and < 26 for 10 years or more; K-MoCA < 7 for illiterate, < 13 for 0.5-3 years, < 16 for 4-6 years, < 19 for 7-9 years, < 20 for 10 years or more) and MCI (K-MMSE < 19 for illiterate, < 26 for 0.5-3 years, < 27 for 4-6 years, < 28 for 7-9 years, and < 29 for 10 years or more; K-MoCA < 13 for illiterate, < 21 for 0.5-3 years, < 23 for 4-6 years, < 25 for 7-9 years, < 26 for 10 years or more). Conclusion Both MMSE and MoCA can be used to screen for dementia in patients with PD, regardless of educational level; however, neither test is sufficient to discriminate MCI from normal cognition without additional information.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.2
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据