4.7 Article

Automatic Carrier Landing System multilayer parameter design based on Cauchy Mutation Pigeon-Inspired Optimization

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 518-530

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.06.013

关键词

Automatic Carrier Landing System (ACLS); Cauchy Mutation Pigeon-Inspired; Optimization (CMPIO); Multilayer design; Parameter optimization

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61333004, 61425008, 91648205]
  2. Graduate Innovation Foundation for Beihang University [YCSJ-01-2016-11]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The parameter adjusting in Automatic Carrier Landing System (ACLS) is a time-consuming and tedious task. In order to improve the efficiency of the adjusting task and overcome the difficulties in the manual parameter adjustment, a multilayer optimization strategy, in which ACLS is clearly divided into four layers including inner loop, autopilot, guidance control and guidance compensation, is proposed in this study and adopted for the parameter design. Besides, a novel algorithm, named Cauchy Mutation Pigeon Inspired Optimization (CMPIO) which is inspired by Cauchy distribution, is proposed to optimize ACLS parameters in each layer. Comparative simulations are conducted to verify the feasibility of the multilayer design strategy and the superiority of CMPIO. To enhance the authenticity of the simulations in the guidance compensation layer, some stochastic conditions are considered with different deck motion, air wake and radar noise turbulences alleviated by several rejection methods. The simulation results prove that the designed ACLS based on the multilayer design strategy satisfies the acknowledged criteria including the time and the frequency domain. Furthermore, the stability of the inner loop and the autopilot integrated with Approach Power Compensation System (APCS) are confirmed. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据