4.7 Article

Optimum distributed wing shaping and control loads for highly flexible aircraft

期刊

AEROSPACE SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 79, 期 -, 页码 255-265

出版社

ELSEVIER FRANCE-EDITIONS SCIENTIFIQUES MEDICALES ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ast.2018.05.045

关键词

Wing shaping control; Optimum wing geometry; Distributed control load; Highly flexible aircraft

资金

  1. Convergent Aeronautics Solutions (CAS) project of NASA ARMD
  2. Alabama Space Grant Consortium (ASGC) Fellowship

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In highly flexible aircraft, the large structural slenderness associated to their high-aspect-ratio wings, while bringing challenges to the design, analysis, and control of such aircraft, can be pro-actively exploited for improving their flight performance, resulting in mission-adaptive morphing configurations. This paper studies the optimum wing bending and torsion deformation of highly flexible aircraft, with distributed control loads along the wing span to achieve the optimum wing geometry. With the goal of improving flight performance across the entire flight regime, a modal based wing shaping optimization is carried out, subject to the requirement of trim and control cost limitation. While a single objective of the minimum drag can be used to find the optimum wing geometry, this paper further considers a trade-off between flight efficiency and structural integrity. In this trade-off study, a multi-objective optimization is formulated and performed, targeting for both minimizing the drag to improve flight efficiency and reducing the gust-induced wing bending moment to enhance the structural integrity. Finally, this paper explores the minimum control cost for different targets of combined flight efficiency and structural integrity. This paper provides not only an efficient way to search for the desired wing planform geometry at a given flight condition but also insights of the required control effort that is necessary to maintain the wing geometry. (C) 2018 Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据