4.5 Article

Comparative performance of a thermal denuder and a catalytic stripper in sampling laboratory and marine exhaust aerosols

期刊

AEROSOL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
卷 52, 期 4, 页码 420-432

出版社

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/02786826.2017.1422236

关键词

Matti Maricq

资金

  1. Tekes (the Finnish Funding Agency for Innovation)
  2. Agco Power Oy
  3. Dinex Ecocat Oy
  4. Dekati Oy
  5. Neste Oyj
  6. Pegasor Oy
  7. Wartsila Finland Oy
  8. Tekes
  9. Wartsila
  10. Pegasor
  11. Spectral Engines
  12. Gasmet
  13. VG-Shipping
  14. HaminaKotka Satama Oy
  15. Oiltanking Finland Oy
  16. Kine Robotics

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The performance of a thermal denuder (thermodenuderTD) and a fresh catalytic stripper (CS) was assessed by sampling laboratory aerosol, produced by different combinations of sulfuric acid, octacosane, and soot particles, and marine exhaust aerosol produced by a medium-speed marine engine using high sulfur fuels. The intention was to study the efficiency in separating non-volatile particles. No particles could be detected downstream of either device when challenged with neat octacosane particles at high concentration. Both laboratory and marine exhaust aerosol measurements showed that sub-23nm semi-volatile particles are formed downstream of the thermodenuder when upstream sulfuric acid approached 100 ppbv. Charge measurements revealed that these are formed by re-nucleation rather than incomplete evaporation of upstream aerosol. Sufficient dilution to control upstream sulfates concentration and moderate TD operation temperature (250 degrees C) are both required to eliminate their formation. Use of the CS following an evaporation tube seemed to eliminate the risk for particle re-nucleation, even at a ten-fold higher concentration of semi-volatiles than in case of the TD. Particles detected downstream of the CS due to incomplete evaporation of sulfuric acid and octacosane aerosol, did not exceed 0.01% of upstream concentration. Despite the superior performance of CS in separating non-volatile particles, the TD may still be useful in cases where increased sensitivity over the traditional evaporation tube method is needed and where high sulfur exhaust concentration may fast deplete the catalytic stripper adsorption capacity.Copyright (c) 2018 American Association for Aerosol Research

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据