4.7 Article

Tradeoffs between water requirements and yield stability in annual vs. perennial crops

期刊

ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES
卷 112, 期 -, 页码 189-202

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2017.12.014

关键词

Agricultural sustainability; Water productivity; Annual crops; Perennial crops; Stochastic model; Irrigation

资金

  1. Swedish Research Council (Vetenskapsradet) [2016-04910]
  2. Faculty of Natural Resources and Agricultural Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences
  3. Land Institute, through the Malone Foundation Perennial Agriculture Project

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Population growth and changes in climate and diets will likely further increase the pressure on agriculture and water resources globally. Currently, staple crops are obtained from annuals plants. A shift towards perennial crops may enhance many ecosystem services, but at the cost of higher water requirements and lower yields. It is still unclear when the advantages of perennial crops overcome their disadvantages and perennial crops are thus a sustainable solution. Here we combine a probabilistic description of the soil water balance and crop development with an extensive dataset of traits of congeneric annuals and perennials to identify the conditions for which perennial crops are more viable than annual ones with reference to yield, yield stability, and effective use of water. We show that the larger and more developed roots of perennial crops allow a better exploitation of soil water resources and a reduction of yield variability with respect to annual species, but their yields remain lower when considering grain crops. Furthermore, perennial crops have higher and more variable irrigation requirements and lower water productivity. These results are important to understand the potential consequences for yield, its stability, and water resource use of a shift from annual to perennial crops and, more generally, if perennial crops may be more resilient than annual crops in the face of climatic fluctuations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据