4.7 Article

Three-dimensional relativistic MHD simulations of active galactic nuclei jets: magnetic kink instability and Fanaroff-Riley dichotomy

期刊

出版社

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slw064

关键词

instabilities; magnetic fields; MHD; galaxies: active; galaxies: jets

资金

  1. NASA through Einstein Postdoctoral Fellowship - Chandra X-ray Center [PF3-140115]
  2. NASA [NAS8-03060]
  3. NSF [TG-AST100040]
  4. Lyman Spitzer Jr Fellowship - Department of Astrophysical Sciences at Princeton University
  5. Max-Planck/Princeton Center for Plasma Physics
  6. Division Of Physics
  7. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [GRANTS:14017644, 1523261, 1410972, 1144374] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Energy deposition by active galactic nuclei jets into the ambient medium can affect galaxy formation and evolution, the cooling of gas flows at the centres of galaxy clusters, and the growth of the supermassive black holes. However, the processes that couple jet power to the ambient medium and determine jet morphology are poorly understood. For instance, there is no agreement on the cause of the well-known Fanaroff-Riley (FR) morphological dichotomy of jets, with FRI jets being shorter and less stable than FRII jets. We carry out global 3D magnetohydrodynamic simulations of relativistic jets propagating through the ambient medium. We show that the flat density profiles of galactic cores slow down and collimate the jets, making them susceptible to the 3D magnetic kink instability. We obtain a critical power, which depends on the galaxy core mass and radius, below which jets become kink-unstable within the core, stall, and inflate cavities filled with relativistically hot plasma. Jets above the critical power stably escape the core and form powerful backflows. Thus, the kink instability controls the jet morphology and can lead to the FR dichotomy. The model-predicted dependence of the critical power on the galaxy optical luminosity agrees well with observations.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据