期刊
PHILOSOPHY PSYCHIATRY & PSYCHOLOGY
卷 23, 期 3-4, 页码 189-201出版社
JOHNS HOPKINS UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1353/ppp.2016.0017
关键词
Critical theory; disability studies; mad studies; recognition; representation; identity politics; lived experience; strategic essentialism
类别
This paper offers a theoretical exploration on the value of harnessing 'people with lived experience of mental health issues' as an identity category to promote mental health social justice change. I engage longstanding feminist, postcolonial, and post-structural philosophical debates that have queried the possibilities, limits, and conditions of drawing on experience as expertise, and apply these debates to show what can happen when we rely on strategic essentialism under the rubric of 'lived experience' to authorize our power. By doing so, I attend to how essentialized notions of lived experience risk effacing the material, ontological and epistemological differences among us that matter, and what such universalism can produce when we engage in research and knowledge production as 'people with lived experience.'
作者
我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。
推荐
暂无数据