4.6 Article

C6 ceramide dramatically enhances docetaxel-induced growth inhibition and apoptosis in cultured breast cancer cells: A mechanism study

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 332, 期 1, 页码 47-59

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2014.12.017

关键词

Metastatic breast cancer; Docetaxel; C6 ceramide; Mitochondrial permeability transition pore; ROS; Signaling transduction

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation [31371139, 81302195]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [BK20130301]
  3. Jiangsu Provincial Special Program of Clinical Medical Science [BL2014040]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Here we reported that co-administration of docetaxel and a cell-permeable short-chain ceramide (C6) resulted in a striking increase in growth inhibition and apoptosis in primary and transformed breast cells (MCF-7 and MDA-231), which were associated with mitochondrial permeability transition pore (mPTP) opening, a significant reactive oxygen species (ROS) production and the pro-apoptotic AMP-Protein Kinase (AMPK) as well as c-Jun N-terminal kinases (JNK) activations. Contrarily, the mPTP blocker sanglifehrin A (SfA) or the ROS scavenger N-acetyl-L-cysteine (NAC) largely inhibited co-administration-induced cytotoxicity. Further, cyclosporin A (CsA), the inhibitor of cyclophilin-D (Cyp-D, the key mPTP component), as well as Cyp-D RNA silencing also suppressed breast cancer cell death by the co-treatment, while cells overexpressing Cyp-D showed hypersensitivity to docetaxel. Meanwhile, JNK and AMPK inhibition alleviated cell death induced by the co-administration in cultured breast cancer cells. Significantly, C6 ceramide plus docetaxel caused dramatic human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)-1/-2 degradation and downstream Akt/Erk inhibition in HER-2 expressing MDA-231 cells. These in vitro findings provide confidence in support of further development of C6 ceramide as an adjunct of docetaxel for the treatment of the metastatic breast cancer. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据