4.8 Article

Surface Nanopore Engineering of 2D MXenes for Targeted and Synergistic Multitherapies of Hepatocellular Carcinoma

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706981

关键词

chemotherapy; hepatocellular carcinoma; mesoporous silica; MXene; nanomedicine; photothermal therapy

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFA0203700]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51722211, 51672303, 81472284, 81672699]
  3. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST [2015QNRC001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and deadly gastrointestinal malignancies. Given its insensitivity to traditional systematic chemotherapy, new therapeutic strategies for efficient HCCs treatment are urgently needed. Here, the development of a novel 2D MXene-based composite nanoplatform for highly efficient and synergistic chemotherapy and photothermal hyperthermia against HCC is reported. A surface-nanopore engineering strategy is developed for the MXenes' surface functionalization, which achieves the uniform coating of a thin mesoporous-silica layer onto the surface of 2D Ti3C2 MXene (Ti3C2@mMSNs). This strategy endows MXenes with well-defined mesopores for on-demand drug release/delivery, enhanced hydrophilicity/dispersity, and abundant surface chemistry for targeting engineering. Systematic in vitro and in vivo evaluations have demonstrated the high active-targeting capability of arginine-glycine-aspartic acid (RGD)-targeting Ti3C2@mMSNs into tumor, and the synergistic chemotherapy (contributed by the mesoporous shell) and photothermal hyperthermia (contributed by the Ti3C2 MXene core) completely eradicate the tumor without obvious reoccurrence. This work not only provides a novel strategy for efficiently combating HCC by developing MXene-based composite nanoplatforms, but also paves a new way for extending the biomedical applications of MXenes by surface-nanopore engineering.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据