3.8 Article

Plantability performance of pneumatic seeders in the soybean culture implantation in the Piaui cerrado - Brasil

期刊

APPLIED RESEARCH & AGROTECHNOLOGY
卷 9, 期 1, 页码 91-103

出版社

UNIV ESTADUAL CENTRO-OESTE
DOI: 10.5935/PAeT.V9.N1.10

关键词

Glycine max; soybean sowing; seed feeder; distribution of seeds; plant population; stand of plants

类别

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The identification of limit speed to make the sowing is important to take advantage of machines with pneumatic system, but is also necessary maintain adequate plantability. Faced with this problem, the objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of plantability of the pneumatic seeders in soybean implantation in Piaui cerrado (savanna). The study was conducted in the municipality of Baixa Grande do Ribeiro, southern Piaui state. The experiment was arranged in a completely randomized design (CRD) in factorial arrangement (2x4), with three replications. Therefore, the first factor was compound by models seeders John Deere (R) (BT2117 and DB740) and the second factor, by four forward speeds of the seeder during operation (V1 = 5,6 km h(-1), V2 = 7,0 km h(-1), V3 = 8,6 km h(-1) e V4 = 10,0 km h(-1)). The plantability was evaluated by checking the number of plants / seeds distributed with seeders, uniformity of planting, spacing acceptable, flawed and double between plants. In seeder John Deere (R) model 2117, with increased speed seeding of 5.6 km h(-1) to 10.0 km h(-1), the number of plants per linear meter is close to the established regulation of the machine. As for the seeder John Deere (R) DB74 model, the plant number value is lower than expected, with an average of 8.76 plants m(-1), (possible result failed regulation / machine calibration before installing the experiment). For both seeders, the percentage of acceptable spacings decreases as increases the travel speed, and flawed spacing increase with increase in speed, thus reducing the uniformity of planting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

3.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据