4.8 Article

Scalable 2D Hierarchical Porous Carbon Nanosheets for Flexible Supercapacitors with Ultrahigh Energy Density

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 11, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706054

关键词

2D; carbon; flexible supercapacitor; graphitization; hierarchical pores

资金

  1. Hong Kong Polytechnic University [1-ZVK1]
  2. Shenzhen Government's Plan of Science and Technology [KQJSCX2017033011014404]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong [2015A030310087, 2017A030310434]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51774203, 51602202, 51374146, 21671136, 51702217]
  5. Chinese Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2017M612750]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

2D carbon nanomaterials such as graphene and its derivatives, have gained tremendous research interests in energy storage because of their high capacitance and chemical stability. However, scalable synthesis of ultrathin carbon nanosheets with well-defined pore architectures remains a great challenge. Herein, the first synthesis of 2D hierarchical porous carbon nanosheets (2D-HPCs) with rich nitrogen dopants is reported, which is prepared with high scalability through a rapid polymerization of a nitrogen-containing thermoset and a subsequent one-step pyrolysis and activation into 2D porous nanosheets. 2D-HPCs, which are typically 1.5 nm thick and 1-3 mu m wide, show a high surface area (2406 m(2) g(-1)) and with hierarchical micro-, meso-, and macropores. This 2D and hierarchical porous structure leads to robust flexibility and good energy-storage capability, being 139 Wh kg(-1) for a symmetric supercapacitor. Flexible supercapacitor devices fabricated by these 2D-HPCs also present an ultrahigh volumetric energy density of 8.4 mWh cm(-3) at a power density of 24.9 mW cm(-3), which is retained at 80% even when the power density is increased by 20-fold. The devices show very high electrochemical life (96% retention after 10000 charge/discharge cycles) and excellent mechanical flexibility.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据