4.6 Article

PKCε as a novel promoter of skeletal muscle differentiation and regeneration

期刊

EXPERIMENTAL CELL RESEARCH
卷 339, 期 1, 页码 10-19

出版社

ELSEVIER INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.yexcr.2015.09.017

关键词

PKC epsilon; HMGA1; C2C12; Satellite cells; Skeletal muscle differentiation

资金

  1. IT-Ministry of the University and Scientific and Technological Research/Ministry of Education, University and Research, MIUR [D91J10000100001]
  2. Regione Emilia-Romagna Area 1 - Strategic Program [PRUa1RI-2012-006]
  3. Cariparma Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Introduction: Satellite cells are muscle resident stem cells and are responsible for muscle regeneration. In this study we investigate the involvement of PKC epsilon during muscle stem cell differentiation in vitro and in vivo. Here, we describe the identification of a previously unrecognized role for the PKC epsilon-HMGA1 signaling axis in myoblast differentiation and regeneration processes. Methods: PKC epsilon expression was modulated in the C2C12 cell line and primary murine satellite cells in vitro, as well as in an in vivo model of muscle regeneration. Immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence, RT-PCR and shRNA silencing techniques were used to determine the role of PKC epsilon and HMGA1 in myogenic differentiation. Results: PKC epsilon expression increases and subsequently re-localizes to the nucleus during skeletal muscle cell differentiation. In the nucleus, PKC epsilon blocks Hmga1 expression to promote Myogenin and Mrf4 accumulation and myoblast formation. Following in vivo muscle injury, PKC epsilon accumulates in regenerating, centrally-nucleated myofibers. Pharmacological inhibition of PKC epsilon impairs the expression of two crucial markers of muscle differentiation, namely MyoD and Myogenin, during injury induced muscle regeneration. Conclusion: This work identifies the PKC epsilon-HMGA1 signaling axis as a positive regulator of skeletal muscle differentiation. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据