4.8 Article

A Dual Immunotherapy Nanoparticle Improves T-Cell Activation and Cancer Immunotherapy

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 25, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201706098

关键词

cancer immunotherapy; checkpoint inhibitor; combination therapy; polymeric nanoparticle; T-cell agonist

资金

  1. National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute [U54CA198999, R01 CA178748]
  2. Department of Defense Congressionally Directed Medical Research Programs-Peer Reviewed Cancer Research Program Idea Award [CA150391]
  3. UNC University Cancer Research Fund
  4. Paul Calabresi Oncology K12 Award
  5. UNC CCNE Pilot Grant

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Combination immunotherapy has recently emerged as a powerful cancer treatment strategy. A promising treatment approach utilizes coadministration of antagonistic antibodies to block checkpoint inhibitor receptors, such as antiprogrammed cell death-1 (aPD1), alongside agonistic antibodies to activate costimulatory receptors, such as antitumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4 (aOX40). Optimal T-cell activation is achieved when both immunomodulatory agents simultaneously engage T-cells and promote synergistic proactivation signaling. However, standard administration of these therapeutics as free antibodies results in suboptimal T-cell binding events, with only a subset of the T-cells binding to both aPD1 and aOX40. Here, it is shown that precise spatiotemporal codelivery of aPD1 and aOX40 using nanoparticles (NP) (dual immunotherapy nanoparticles, DINP) results in improved T-cell activation, enhanced therapeutic efficacy, and increased immunological memory. It is demonstrated that DINP elicits higher rates of T-cell activation in vitro than free antibodies. Importantly, it is demonstrated in two tumor models that combination immunotherapy administered in the form of DINP is more effective than the same regimen administered as free antibodies. This work demonstrates a novel strategy to improve combination immunotherapy using nanotechnology.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据