4.8 Article

Reconfigurable Diodes Based on Vertical WSe2 Transistors with van der Waals Bonded Contacts

期刊

ADVANCED MATERIALS
卷 30, 期 18, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adma.201707200

关键词

2D materials; contact engineering; field effect transistor devices; reconfigurable devices; van der Waals contact

资金

  1. Elemental Strategy Initiative
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation [157739]
  3. JSPS KAKENHI [JP15K21722, JP25106006]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [682332]
  5. Marie Curie-Sklodowska COFUND [665667]
  6. European Union [696656]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

New device concepts can increase the functionality of scaled electronic devices, with reconfigurable diodes allowing the design of more compact logic gates being one of the examples. In recent years, there has been significant interest in creating reconfigurable diodes based on ultrathin transition metal dichalcogenide crystals due to their unique combination of gate-tunable charge carriers, high mobility, and sizeable band gap. Thanks to their large surface areas, these devices are constructed under planar geometry and the device characteristics are controlled by electrostatic gating through rather complex two independent local gates or ionic-liquid gating. In this work, similar reconfigurable diode action is demonstrated in a WSe2 transistor by only utilizing van der Waals bonded graphene and Co/h-BN contacts. Toward this, first the charge injection efficiencies into WSe2 by graphene and Co/h-BN contacts are characterized. While Co/h-BN contact results in nearly Schottky-barrier-free charge injection, graphene/WSe2 interface has an average barrier height of approximate to 80 meV. By taking the advantage of the electrostatic transparency of graphene and the different work-function values of graphene and Co/h-BN, vertical devices are constructed where different gate-tunable diode actions are demonstrated. This architecture reveals the opportunities for exploring new device concepts.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据