4.8 Article

Efficient Near-Infrared Emission by Adjusting the Guest-Host Interactions in Thermally Activated Delayed Fluorescence Organic Light-Emitting Diodes

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 32, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201802597

关键词

guest-host interactions; near-infrared OLEDs; thermally activated delayed fluorescence; wavelength tunability

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773141, 21572152, 61575136]
  2. Collaborative Innovation Centre of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology (Nano-CIC)
  3. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD)
  4. 111 Project of The State Administration of Foreign Experts Affairs of China

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Thermally activated delayed fluorescence materials can effectively achieve high efficiency by harvesting singlet and triplet excitons in organic light-emitting diodes (OLEDs). However, the choice of host material has a huge impact on the efficiency of the device, especially for the near-infrared (NIR) luminescent material. In this contribution, a series of host materials are used to match the thermally activated delayed fluorescence emitter, 3,4-bis(4-(diphenylamino)phenyl)acenaphtho[1,2-b]pyrazine-8,9-dicarbonitrile (APDC-DTPA), for fabricating NIR OLEDs. All the host materials have the higher triplet energy than that of APDC-DTPA. As the organometallic compound of Zn(BTZ)(2) has relatively stronger dipole moment, the electroluminescence spectral peak of doped device shows strong bathochromic shift exceeding 700 nm and changes with doping concentration. Finally, the extremely high external quantum efficiency of 7.8% (with 10 wt% of doping concentration) and 5.1% (with 20 wt% of doping concentration) are achieved with the emission peaks of 710 and 728 nm, respectively, which are superior to that of the device based on the other host materials. The approach is feasible to achieve bathochromic shift and highly efficient fluorescent OLEDs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据