4.8 Article

Ultrasensitive Room-Temperature Terahertz Direct Detection Based on a Bismuth Selenide Topological Insulator

期刊

ADVANCED FUNCTIONAL MATERIALS
卷 28, 期 31, 页码 -

出版社

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adfm.201801786

关键词

surface states; terahertz waves; topological insulators

资金

  1. State Key Program for Basic Research of China [2017YFA0305500, 2017YFA0205801]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11334008, 61521005, 61675222]
  3. Youth Innovation Promotion Association (CAS) [20162490001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Despite their huge application capabilities, millimeter- and terahertz-wave photodetectors still face challenges in the detection scheme. Topological insulators (TIs) are predicted to be promising candidates for long-wavelength photodetection, due to the presence of Dirac fermions in their topologically protected surface states. However, photodetection based on TIs is usually hindered by the large dark current, originating from the mixing of bulk states with topological surface states (TSSs) in most realistic samples of TIs. Here millimeter and terahertz detectors based on a subwavelength metal-TI-metal (MTM) heterostructure are demonstrated. The achieved photoresponse stems from the asymmetric scattering of TSS, driven by the localized surface plasmon-induced terahertz field, which ultimately produces direct photocarriers beyond the interband limit. The device enables high responsivity in both the self-powered and bias modes even at room temperature. The achieved responsivity is over 75 A/W, with response time shorter than 60 ms in the self-powered mode. Remarkably, the responsivity increases by several orders of magnitude in the biased configuration, with the noise-equivalent power (NEP) of 3.6 x 10(-13) W Hz(-1/2) and a detectivity of 2.17 x 10(11) cm Hz(-1/2) W-1 at room temperature. The detection performances open a way toward realistic exploitation of TIs for large-area, real-time imaging within long-wavelength optoelectronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据