4.5 Article

The risk of Alzheimer's disease associated with benzodiazepines and related drugs: a nested case-control study

期刊

ACTA PSYCHIATRICA SCANDINAVICA
卷 138, 期 2, 页码 91-100

出版社

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/acps.12909

关键词

Alzheimer; pharmacoepidemiology; risk factors; dementia

资金

  1. Academy of Finland [307232, 295334]
  2. University of Eastern Finland
  3. Academy of Finland (AKA) [295334, 307232, 307232, 295334] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Objective: To assess the association between benzodiazepine and related drug (BZDR) use and risk of Alzheimer's disease (AD) with cumulative consumption and duration of use based models. Method: A nationwide nested case-control study of all Finnish community-dwelling persons who received clinically verified AD diagnosis in 2005-2011 (N=70719) and their matched controls (N=282862). AD diagnosis was based on DSM-IV and NINCDS-ADRDA criteria. BZDR purchases were extracted from the Prescription Register since 1995. The association between BZDR use and AD was assessed using conditional logistic regression with 5-year lag time between exposure and outcome. Results: Benzodiazepine and related drug use was associated with modestly increased risk of AD (adjusted OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08). A dose-response relationship was observed with both cumulative consumption and duration. Adjustment for other psychotropics removed the cumulative dose-response relationship by attenuating the ORs in the highest dose category. Conclusion: Benzodiazepine and related drug use in general was associated with modestly increased risk of AD. No major differences were observed between different subcategories of BZDRs (i.e. benzodiazepines, Z drugs, short-/medium-acting or long-acting BZDRs). As dose-response relationship abolished after adjustment for other psychotropics, it is possible that the association may partially be due to antidepressants and/or antipsychotics, or concomitant use of these medications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.5
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据