4.7 Article

Trends in atmospheric ammonia at urban, rural, and remote sites across North America

期刊

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
卷 16, 期 17, 页码 11465-11475

出版社

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-11465-2016

关键词

-

资金

  1. Clear Air Regulatory Agenda of Canada
  2. National Program on Key Basic Research Project (973 Program) of China [2014CB953700]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Interannual variabilities in atmospheric ammonia (NH3) during the most recent 7-11 years were investigated at 14 sites across North America using the monitored data obtained from NAPS, CAPMoN and AMoN networks. The long-term average of atmospheric NH3 ranged from 0.8 to 2.6 ppb, depending on location, at four urban and two rural/agricultural sites in Canada. The annual average at these sites did not show any deceasing trend with largely decreasing anthropogenic NH3 emission. An increasing trend was actually identified from 2003 to 2014 at the downtown Toronto site using either the Mann-Kendall or the ensemble empirical mode decomposition method, but no or stable trends were identified at other sites. The similar to 20% increase during the 11-year period at the site was likely caused by changes in NH4+-NH3 partitioning and/or air-surface exchange process as a result of the decreased sulfur emission and increased ambient temperature. The long-term average from 2008 to 2015 was 1.6-4.9 ppb and 0.3-0.5 ppb at four rural/agricultural and at four remote US sites, respectively. A stable trend in NH3 mixing ratio was identified at one rural/agricultural site while increasing trends were identified at three rural/agricultural (0.6-2.6 ppb, 20-50% increase from 2008 to 2015) and four remote sites (0.3-0.5 ppb, 100-200% increase from 2008 to 2015). Increased ambient temperature was identified to be a cause for the increasing trends in NH3 mixing ratio at four out of the seven US sites, but what caused the increasing trends at other US sites needs further investigation.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据