4.3 Article

Herbivory alters plant carbon assimilation, patterns of biomass allocation and nitrogen use efficiency

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.actao.2017.11.007

关键词

Anti-herbivore defenses; Herbivory-induce resource sequestration; Leaf mass per area; Photosynthesis; Photosynthetic nitrogen use efficiency; Prunus avium

类别

资金

  1. CyT Chubut, Argentina
  2. CONICET (PIP grant) [112-200801-01703]
  3. ANCyT-FONCyT (PICT grant) [2008-1202, 2010-960]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Herbivory can trigger physiological processes resulting in leaf and whole plant functional changes. The effects of chronic infestation by an insect on leaf traits related to carbon and nitrogen economy in three Prunus aviurn cultivars were assessed. Leaves from non-infested trees (control) and damaged leaves from infested trees were selected. The insect larvae produce skeletonization of the leaves leaving relatively intact the vein network of the eaten leaves and the abaxial epidermal tissue. At the leaf level, nitrogen content per mass (N-mass) and per area (N-area), net photosynthesis per mass (A(mass)) and per area (A(area)), photosynthetic nitrogen-use efficiency (PNUE), leaf mass per area (LMA) and total leaf phenols content were measured in the three cultivars. All cultivars responded to herbivory in a similar fashion. The N-mass A(mass), and PNUE decreased, while LMA and total content of phenols increased in partially damaged leaves. Increases in herbivore pressure resulted in lower leaf size and total leaf area per plant across cultivars. Despite this, stem cumulative growth tended to increase in infected plants suggesting a change in the patterns of biomass allocation and in resources sequestration elicited by herbivory. A larger N investment in defenses instead of photosynthetic structures may explain the lower PNUE and A(mass) observed in damaged leaves. Some physiological changes due to herbivory partially compensate for the cost of leaf removal buffering the carbon economy at the whole plant level.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.3
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据