4.7 Article

Twinning-induced plasticity (TWIP) steels

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 142, 期 -, 页码 283-362

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.06.046

关键词

Mechanical twinning; Dislocation glide; High manganese steel; Stacking fault energy; Strain hardening

资金

  1. Russian Ministry of Education and Science [14.A12.31.0001]
  2. Increased Competitiveness Program of NUST MISiS [K2-2016-062]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

This article reviews original work and important new developments in the field of deformation behavior of high manganese face-centered cubic gamma-Fe alloys. Owing to their exceptional mechanical properties, these alloys, referred to as twinning-induced plasticity, or TWIP, steels, have come to the fore as prime candidate materials for light-weight applications, notably in automotive, shipbuilding, and oil and gas industries. It is established that a superior combination of strength and ductility exhibited by TWIP steels is associated with a specific character of the variation of the dislocation density. The defining feature of TWIP steels is the small magnitude of the intrinsic stacking fault energy. In addition to limiting the dynamic recovery rate, the low stacking fault energy of TWIP steels results in the formation of isolated stacking faults and deformation twins, which reduces the dislocation mean free path. Both effects lead to an increased strain hardening rate. Despite the progress made, there are still considerable differences between the models proposed for the microstructural evolution during the deformation of TWIP steels and the concomitant strain hardening behavior. The review surveys the experimental literature, summarizes the current modeling concepts, and identifies the outstanding issues with TWIP steels that require the attention of the materials science community. Suggestions for the directions of future research on twinning-induced plasticity steels are offered. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据