4.7 Article

Analysis of thermal desorption of hydrogen in metallic alloys

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 144, 期 -, 页码 777-785

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2017.11.011

关键词

Thermal desorption spectrometry; Hydrogen embrittlement; Diffusion; Trap binding energy; Trap density

资金

  1. BP through the BP International Centre for Advanced Materials (BP-ICAM-02ext)
  2. US Office of Naval Research [N62909-14-1-N232]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The degree of embrittlement of metallic alloys is sensitive to the concentration of absorbed hydrogen, with hydrogen traps (particularly at grain boundaries) playing an important role. Thermal desorption spectrometry (TDS) is widely used to measure the detrapping and diffusion behaviour of hydrogen in metallic alloys. However, it is problematic to obtain a consistent interpretation of TDS data from the literature, due to the large number of material parameters that influence the measurement, and this results in a wide range of quoted values for trapping parameters such as the number of trap types, trap binding energies and trap densities. In this paper, the governing partial differential equation for hydrogen diffusion with sink and source terms for a single trap is formulated in non-dimensional form, assuming local equilibrium between the hydrogen atoms at the lattice sites and the trap sites. An asymptotic analysis reveals two distinct regimes of diffusion behaviour in TDS tests. Kissinger-type behaviour is expected in a TDS test for low heating rates on an alloy with a low lattice activation energy. Contour maps of maximum hydrogen flux and the corresponding temperature are plotted using axes of trap density and trap binding energy by making use of the full numerical solution (and asymptotic solutions). These maps serve as a useful tool for an accurate and simple determination of the trap binding energy as well as the trap density. (C) 2017 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据