4.7 Article

Rapid solidification of non-stoichiometric intermetallic compounds: Modeling and experimental verification

期刊

ACTA MATERIALIA
卷 148, 期 -, 页码 86-99

出版社

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actamat.2018.01.040

关键词

Intermetallic compounds; Thermodynamic extremal principle; Rapid solidification; Undercooling; Dendrite growth

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51371149, 51671075]
  2. Huo Yingdong Young Teacher Fund [151048]
  3. Aeronautical Science Foundation of China [2015ZF53066]
  4. Free Research Fund of State Key Lab. of Solidification Processing [92-QZ-2014]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The thermodynamic extremal principle was applied to model of rapid solidification of non-stoichiometric intermetallic compounds and the Co-xat.%Si alloys (x = 50, 53, 55) were undercooled to test the model. It is the model with but not the model without solute drag that can be derived self consistently in thermodynamics. Unique dual sluggish and abrupt growth stages were found in under cooled Co-53 at.%Si and Co-55 at.%Si alloys. The first (second) sluggish stage is solute-controlled (thermal-controlled). The first (second) abrupt growth stage is ascribed to the sharp occurrence of solute trapping (inverted partitioning) and disorder trapping that initiates the transition from solute-controlled (thermal-controlled) to thermal-controlled (kinetic-controlled) growth. Since the predictions by the current (previous) model with (without) solute drag predicted well (deviate drastically from) the experimental results, solute drag was suggested be significant upon rapid solidification. The current work solved such an open problem, i.e. solute drag in solidification, and is helpful for not only understanding the non-equilibrium phenomena that is of theoretical importance but also controlling the non equilibrium microstructures that is of technological importance. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据