4.8 Article

Hybrid collagen alginate hydrogel as a platform for 3D tumor spheroid invasion

期刊

ACTA BIOMATERIALIA
卷 75, 期 -, 页码 213-225

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.06.003

关键词

Tumor invasion; Tumor spheroid; 3D model; Biomaterial; Hydrogel

资金

  1. United States National Institutes of Health [R01CA196018, U01CA210152]
  2. NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE [U01CA210152, R01CA196018, R01CA195655] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Extracellular matrix regulates hallmark features of cancer through biochemical and mechanical signals, although mechanistic understanding of these processes remains limited by lack of models that recreate physiology of tumors. To tissue-engineer models that recapitulate three-dimensional architecture and signaling in tumors, there is a pressing need for new materials permitting flexible control of mechanical and biophysical features. We developed a hybrid hydrogel system composed of collagen and alginate to model tumor environments in breast cancer and other malignancies. Material properties of the hydrogel, including stiffness, microstructure and porosimetry, encompass parameters present in normal organs and tumors. The hydrogel possesses a well-organized, homogenous microstructure with adjustable mechanical stiffness and excellent permeability. Upon embedding multicellular tumor spheroids, we constructed a 3D tumor invasion model showing follow-the-leader migration with fibroblasts leading invasion of cancer cells similar to in vivo. We also demonstrated effects of CXCL12-CXCR4 signaling, a pathway implicated in tumor progression and metastasis, in a dual-tumor spheroid invasion model in 3D hydrogels. These studies establish a new hydrogel platform with material properties that can be tuned to investigate effects of environmental conditions on tumor progression, which will advance future studies of cancer cell invasion and response to therapy. (C) 2018 Acta Materialia Inc. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据