4.6 Article

Direct versus indirect band gap emission and exciton-exciton annihilation in atomically thin molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2)

期刊

PHYSICAL REVIEW B
卷 94, 期 8, 页码 -

出版社

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevB.94.085429

关键词

-

资金

  1. Agence Nationale de la Recherche [QuanDoGra 12 JS10-001-01, H2DH ANR-15-CE24-0016]
  2. LabEx NIE (WHO)
  3. CNRS
  4. Universite de Strasbourg

向作者/读者索取更多资源

We probe the room temperature photoluminescence of N-layer molybdenum ditelluride (MoTe2) in the continuous wave (cw) regime. The photoluminescence quantum yield of monolayer MoTe2 is three times larger than in bilayer MoTe2 and 40 times greater than in the bulk limit. Mono-and bilayer MoTe2 display almost symmetric emission lines at 1.10 and 1.07 eV, respectively, which predominantly arise from direct radiative recombination of the A exciton. In contrast, N >= 3-layer MoTe2 exhibits a much reduced photoluminescence quantum yield and a broader, redshifted, and seemingly bimodal photoluminescence spectrum. The low-and high-energy contributions are attributed to emission from the indirect and direct optical band gaps, respectively. Bulk MoTe2 displays a broad emission line with a dominant contribution at 0.94 eV that is assigned to emission from the indirect optical band gap. As compared to related systems (such as MoS2, MoSe2, WS2, and WSe2), the smaller energy difference between the monolayer direct optical band gap and the bulk indirect optical band gap leads to a smoother increase of the photoluminescence quantum yield as N decreases. In addition, we study the evolution of the photoluminescence intensity in monolayer MoTe2 as a function of the exciton formation rate W-abs up to 3.6 x 10(22) cm(-2) s(-1). The line shape of the photoluminescence spectrum remains largely independent of W-abs, whereas the photoluminescence intensity grows sublinearly above W-abs similar to 10(21) cm(-2) s(-1). This behavior is assigned to exciton-exciton annihilation and is well captured by an elementary rate equation model.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据