4.8 Article

Hierarchical Multiplexing Nanodroplets for Imaging-Guided Cancer Radiotherapy via DNA Damage Enhancement and Concomitant DNA Repair Prevention

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 6, 页码 5684-5698

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b01508

关键词

cancer radiotherapy; DNA damage and repair; hierarchical nanostructure; tumor hypoxia; multimodal imaging

资金

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFA0205600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773191, 51573176, 51633008, 51625305, 81772837]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Clinical success of cancer radiotherapy is usually impeded by a combination of two factors, i.e., insufficient DNA damage and rapid DNA repair during and after treatment, respectively. Existing strategies for optimizing the radiotherapeutic efficacy often focus on only one facet of the issue, which may fail to function in the long term trials. Herein, we report a DNA-dual-targeting approach for enhanced cancer radiotherapy using a hierarchical multiplexing nanodroplet, which can simultaneously promote DNA lesion formation and prevent subsequent DNA damage repair. Specifically, the ultrasmall gold nanoparticles encapsulated in the liquid nanodroplets can concentrate the radiation energy and induce dramatic DNA damage as evidenced by the enhanced formation of gamma-H2AX foci as well as in vivo tumor growth inhibition. Additionally, the ultrasound triggered burst release of oxygen may relieve tumor hypoxia and fix the DNA radical intermediates produced by ionizing radiation, prevent DNA repair, and eventually result in cancer death. Finally, the nanodroplet platform is compatible with fluorescence, ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging techniques, allowing for real-time in vivo imaging-guided precision radiotherapy in an EMT-6 tumor model with significantly enhanced treatment efficacy. Our DNA-dual-targeting design of simultaneously enhancing DNA damage and preventing DNA repair presents an innovative strategy to effective cancer radiotherapy.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据