4.8 Article

Multistep Lithiation of Tin Sulfide: An Investigation Using in Situ Electron Microscopy

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 4, 页码 3638-3645

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00758

关键词

lithium-ion batteries; in situ transmission electron microscopy; tin disulfide; multistep lithiation; density functional theory

资金

  1. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), Office of Basic Energy Science [DE-SC0012704]
  2. US Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences [DEAC02-06CH11357]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Two-dimensional (2D) metal sulfides have been widely explored as promising electrodes for lithium ion batteries since their two-dimensional layered structure allows lithium ions to intercalate between layers. For tin disulfide, the lithiation process proceeds via a sequence of three different types of reactions: intercalation, conversion, and alloying, but the full scenario of reaction dynamics remains nebulous. Here, we investigate the dynamical process of the multistep reactions using in situ electron microscopy and discover the formation of an intermediate rock salt phase with the disordering of Li and Sn cations after initial 2D intercalation. The disordered cations occupy all the octahedral sites and block the channels for intercalation, which alter the reaction pathways during further lithiation. Our first-principles calculations of the nonequilibrium lithiation of SnS2 corroborate the energetic preference of the disordered rock-salt structure over known layered polymorphs. The in situ observations and calculations suggest a two-phase reaction nature for intercalation, disordering, and following conversion reactions. In addition, in situ delithiation observation confirms that the alloying reaction is reversible, while the conversion reaction is not, which is consistent with the ex situ analysis. This work reveals the full lithiation characteristic of SnS2 and sheds light on the understanding of complex multistep reactions in 2D materials.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据