4.8 Article

The Effect of Dielectric Environment on Doping Efficiency in Colloidal PbSe Nanostructures

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 2, 页码 1313-1320

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.7b07602

关键词

doping; dielectric confinement; PbSe; nanocrystal; nanowire

资金

  1. NSF [DMR-1309053]
  2. NSF through the University of Pennsylvania Materials Research Science and Engineering Center (MRSEC) [DMR-1720530]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Doping, as a central strategy to control free carrier type and concentration in semiconductor materials, suffers from low efficiency at the nanoscale, especially in systems having high permittivity (epsilon) and large Bohr radii, such as lead chalcogenide nanocrystals (NCs) and nanowires (NI/Vs). Here, we study dielectric confinement effects on the doping efficiency of lead chalcogenides nanostructures by integrating PbSe NWs in the platform of field effect transistors (FETs). Elemental Pb or In or elemental Se is deposited by thermal evaporation to remotely n- or p-dope the NWs. Polymeric and oxide materials of varying e are subsequently deposited to control the dielectric environment surrounding the NWs. Analyzing the device characteristics, we extract the change of carrier concentration introduced by tailoring the dielectric environment. The calculated doping efficiency for n-type (Pb/In) and p-type (Se) dopants increases as the e of the surrounding medium increases. Using a high-e material, such as HfO2 for encapsulation, the doping efficiency can be enhanced by >10-fold. A theoretical model is built to describe the doping efficiency in PbSe NWs embedded in different dielectric environments, which agrees with our experimental data for both NW array and single NW devices. As dielectric confinement affects all low-dimensional materials, engineering the dielectric environment is a promising general approach to enhance doping concentrations, without introducing excess impurities that may scatter carriers, and is suitable for various device applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据