4.8 Article

Triboelectric-Nanogenerator-Based Soft Energy-Harvesting Skin Enabled by Toughly Bonded Elastomer/Hydrogel Hybrids

期刊

ACS NANO
卷 12, 期 3, 页码 2818-2826

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsnano.8b00108

关键词

triboelectric nanogenerator; soft electronics; hydrogel; energy harvesting skin; tough bonding

资金

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0202703]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51432005, 61574018, 51603013]
  3. Beijing Municipal Science AMP
  4. Technology Commission [Z171100000317001]
  5. Thousands Talents program for pioneer researcher and his innovation team, China
  6. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of CAS, Hundred Talents Program of CAS

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A major challenge accompanying the booming next-generation soft electronics is providing correspondingly soft and sustainable power sources for driving such devices. Here, we report stretchable triboelectric nanogenerators (TENG) with dual working modes based on the soft hydrogel-elastomer hybrid as energy skins for harvesting biomechanical energies. The tough interfacial bonding between the hydrophilic hydrogel and hydrophobic elastomer, achieved by the interface modification, ensures the stable mechanical and electrical performances of the TENGs. Furthermore, the dehydration of this toughly bonded hydrogel-elastomer hybrid is significantly inhibited (the average dehydration decreases by over 73%). With PDMS as the electrification layer and hydrogel as the electrode, a stretchable, transparent (90% transmittance), and ultrathin (380 mu m) single-electrode TENG was fabricated to conformally attach on human skin and deform as the body moves. The two-electrode mode TENG is capable of harvesting energy from arbitrary human motions (press, stretch, bend, and twist) to drive the self-powered electronics. This work provides a feasible technology to design soft power sources, which could potentially solve the energy issues of soft electronics.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据