4.6 Article

3-Substituted 1,5-Diary1-1H-1,2,4-triazoles as Prospective PET Radioligands for Imaging Brain COX-1 in Monkey. Part 2: Selection and Evaluation of [C-11]PS13 for Quantitative Imaging

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL NEUROSCIENCE
卷 9, 期 11, 页码 2620-2627

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00103

关键词

COX-1; PET; radioligand; brain; carbon-11; fluorine-18

资金

  1. National Institute of Health (NIH) [ZIA-MH002852, ZIA-MH002793]
  2. NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF MENTAL HEALTH [ZIAMH002793, ZIAMH002795] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In our preceding paper (Part 1), we identified three 1,5-bis-diaryl-1,2,4-triazole-based compounds that merited evaluation as potential positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands for selectively imaging cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1) in monkey and human brain, namely, 1,5-bis(4-methoxypheny1)-3-(alkoxy)-1H-1,2,4-triazoles bearing a 3-methoxy (PS1), a 3-(2,2,2-trifluoroethoxy) (PS13), or a 3-fluoromethoxy substituent (PS2). PS1 and PS13 were labeled from phenol precursors by O-C-11-methylation with [C-11]-iodomethane and PS2 by O-F-18-fluoroalkylation with [H-2(2),F-18]fluorobromomethane. Here, we evaluated these PET radioligands in monkey. All three radioligands gave moderately high uptake in brain, although [H-2(2),F-18]PS2 also showed undesirable radioactivity uptake in skull. [C-11]PS13 was selected for further evaluation, mainly based on more favorable brain kinetics than [C-11]PS1. Pharmacological preblock experiments showed that about 55% of the radioactivity uptake in brain was specifically bound to COX-1. An index of enzyme density, V-T, was well identified from serial brain scans and from the concentrations of parent radioligand in arterial plasma. In addition, V-T values were stable within 80 min, suggesting that brain uptake was not contaminated by radiometabolites. [C-11]PS13 successfully images and quantifies COX-1 in monkey brain, and merits further investigation for imaging COX-1 in monkey models of neuroinflammation and in healthy human subjects.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据