4.6 Article

The Biochemical Basis of Vitamin A Production from the Asymmetric Carotenoid β-Cryptoxanthin

期刊

ACS CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
卷 13, 期 8, 页码 2121-2129

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acschembio.8b00290

关键词

-

资金

  1. National Eye Institute [EY020551]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Vitamin A serves essential functions in mammalian biology as a signaling molecule and chromophore. This lipid can be synthesized from more than 50 putative dietary provitamin A precursor molecules which contain at least one unsubstituted beta-ionone ring. We here scrutinized the enzymatic properties and substrate specificities of the two structurally related carotenoid cleavage dioxygenases (CCDs) which catalyze this synthesis. Recombinant BC01 split substrates across the C15,C15' double bond adjacent to a canonical beta-ionone ring site to vitamin A aldehyde. Substitution of the ring with a hydroxyl group prevented this conversion. The removal of methyl groups from the polyene carbon backbone of the substrate did not impede enzyme activity. Homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis identified amino acid residues at the entrance of the substrate tunnel, which determined BCO1's specificity for the canonical beta-ionone ring site. In contrast, BCO2 split substrates across the C9,C10 double bond adjacent to assorted ionone ring sites. Kinetic analysis revealed a higher catalytic efficiency of BCO2 with substrates bearing 3-hydroxy-beta-ionone rings. In the mouse intestine, the asymmetric carotenoid beta-cryptoxanthin with one canonical and one 3-hydroxy-beta-ionone ring site was meticulously converted to vitamin A. The tailoring of this asymmetric substrate occurred by a stepwise processing of the carotenoid substrate by both CCDs and involved a beta-apo-10'-carotenal intermediate. Thus, opposite selectivity for ionone ring sites of the two mammalian CCDs complement each other in the metabolic challenge of vitamin A production from a chemically diverse set of precursor molecules.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据