4.8 Article

Highly Efficient and Reliable Transparent Electromagnetic Interference Shielding, Film

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 14, 页码 11941-11949

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b00492

关键词

AgNW networks; EMI shielding; optical transmittance; flexible; reliable

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21704070, 51673134, 51721091]
  2. Science and Technology Department of Sichuan Province [2017GZ0412]
  3. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [2017SCU04A03, sklpme2017306, 2012017yjsy102]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Electromagnetic protection in optoelectronic instruments such as optical windows and electronic displays is challenging because of the essential requirements of a high optical transmittance and an electromagnetic interference (EMI) shielding effectiveness (SE). Herein, we demonstrate the creation of an efficient transparent EMI shielding film that is composed of calcium alginate (CA), silver nanowies (AgNVVs), and polyurethane (PU), via a facile and low-cost Mayer-rod coating method. The CA/AgNW/PU film with a high optical transmittance of 92% achieves an EMI SE of 20.7 dB, which meets the requirements for commercial shielding applications. A superior EMI SE of 31.3 dB could be achieved, whereas the transparent film still maintains a transmittance of 81%. The integrated efficient EMI SE and high transmittance are superior to those of most previously reported transparent EMI shielding materials. Moreover, our transparent films exhibit a highly reliable shielding ability in a complex service environment, with 98 and 96% EMI SE retentions even after 30 min of ultrasound treatment and 5000 bending cycles (1.5 mm radius), respectively. The comprehensive performance thit is associated with the facile fabrication strategy imparts the CA/AgNW/PU film with great potential as an optimized EMI shielding material in emerging optoelectronic devices, such as flexible solar cells, displays, and touch panels.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据