4.8 Article

Unraveling the Mechanism of Photoinduced Charge-Transfer Process in Bilayer Heterojunction

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 30, 页码 25401-25408

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b07138

关键词

Two-dimensional heterostructure; solar cell; charge-transfer dynamics; built-in electric field; type-II band alignment; Z-scheme

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11604213, 11574217]
  2. Natural Science and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC)
  3. Shenzhen Key Lab Fund [ZDSYS20170228105421966]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Charge transfer is a fundamental process that determines the performance of solar cell devices. Although great efforts have been made, the detailed mechanism of charge-transfer process across the two-dimensional van der Waals (vdW) heterostructure remains elusive. Here, on the basis of the ab initio nonadiabatic molecular dynamics simulation, we model the photoinduced charge-transfer dynamics at the InSe/InTe vdW heterostructures. Our results show that carriers can follow either the R-scheme or Z-scheme transfer path, depending on the coupling between the interlayer states at the band-edge positions. In addition, the charge-transfer dynamics can be effectively controlled by the external parameters, such as strains and interlayer stacking configurations. The predicated electron-hole recombination lifetime in the R-scheme transfer path is up to 1.4 ns, whereas it is shortened to 1.2 ps in the Z-scheme transfer path. The proposed R-scheme and Z-scheme are further verified by the quantum transport simulations on the basis of the density functional theory (DFT) method combined with nonequilibrium Green's functions (NEGF-DFT). The analysis reveals that the system dominated by the Z-scheme shows better performance, which can be attributed to the built-in electric field that facilitates the charge transfer. Our work may pave the way for the designing of next-generation devices for light detecting and harvesting.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据