4.8 Article

Tumor Catalytic-Photothermal Therapy with Yolk-Shell Gold@Carbon Nanozymes

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 5, 页码 4502-4511

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b17916

关键词

nanozymes; yolk-shell structure; carbon/Au composite; ROS; thermal therapy

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673202, 81671810, 21703198]
  2. University Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province [16KJD150004]
  3. Social Development Project of Yangzhou City [YZ2016074]
  4. Innovation Foundation of Yangzhou University [2015CXJ069]
  5. Interdisciplinary Subject Construction Foundation of Yangzhou University [jcxk 2015-19]
  6. Top-notch Academic Programs Project of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  7. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Nanozymes, as a new generation of artificial enzymes, offer great opportunities in biomedical engineering and disease treatment. Synergizing the multiple intrinsic functions of nanozymes can improve their performance in biological systems. Here, we report a novel nanozyme with yolk shell structure fabricated by combining a single gold nanoparticle core with a porous hollow carbon shell nanospheres (Au@HCNs). Au@HCNs exhibited enzyme-like activities similar to horseradish peroxidase and oxidase under an acidic environment, showing the ability of ROS generation. More importantly, the ROS production of Au@HCNs was significantly improved upon 808 rim light irradiation by the photothermal effect, which is often used for tumor therapy. Cellular and animal studies further demonstrated that the efficient tumor destruction was achieved through the combination of light enhanced ROS and photothermal therapy. These results implied that the intrinsic enzyme-like activity and photothermal conversion of nanozymes can be synergized for efficient tumor treatment, providing a proof-of-concept of tumor catalytic photothermal therapy based on nanozymes.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据