4.8 Article

Robust Covalently Cross-linked Polybenzimidazole/Graphene Oxide Membranes for High-Flux Organic Solvent Nanofiltration

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 18, 页码 16140-16147

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03591

关键词

composite membrane; graphene sieve; mixed matrix membrane; surface modification; cross-linking

资金

  1. UK's Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC)
  2. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) through BioProNET Network in Industrial Biotechnology and Bioenergy [BB/L013770/1]
  3. BBSRC [BB/L013770/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Robust, readily scalable, high-flux graphene oxide (GO) mixed matrix composite membranes were developed for organic solvent nanofiltration. Hydroxylated polybenzimidazole was synthesized by N-benzylation of polybenzimidazole with 4-(chloromethyl)benzyl alcohol, which was confirmed by FTIR and NMR spectroscopy. Flat-sheet composite membranes comprising of polybenzimidazoles and 1 or 2 wt % GO were fabricated via conventional blade coating and phase inversion. Subsequently, GO was covalently anchored to the hydroxyl groups of the polymer using a diisocyanate cross-linking agent. The even distribution of GO in the membranes was mapped by visible-light microscopy. Hydroxylation and incorporation of GO in the polymer matrix increased the permeance up to 45.2 +/- 1.6 L m(-2) h(-1) bar(-1) in acetone, nearly 5 times higher than the unmodified benchmark membrane. The enhancement in permeance from the addition of GO did not compromise the solute rejection. The composite membranes were found to be tight in seven organic solvents, having molecular weight cut-offs (MWCO) as low as 140 g mol(-1). Permeance increased with increasing solvent polarity, while rejection of a 420 g mol(-1) pharmaceutical remained over 93%. The covalent anchoring resulted in robust composite membranes that maintained constant performance over 14 days in a continuous cross-flow configuration.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据