4.8 Article

The more interactions the better? The moderating effect of the interaction between local producers and users of knowledge on the relationship between R&D investment and regional innovation systems

期刊

出版社

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2016.03.025

关键词

Regional innovation systems; R&D investment from firms; R&D investment from universities and research institutes; The interaction between local producers and users of knowledge

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71572017, 71202116, 71202029, 71202150]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities
  3. Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China [SKZZX2013038, SKZZA2015011]
  4. Youth Social Science Talent funding Project, Beijing Federation of Social Science Circles, Beijing, China [2015SKL011]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Under the fierce pressures of the rapidly changing environments, regional innovation systems are important in regional economy and national competitiveness. This study examines how R&D Investment from firms, universities and research institutes (Core component of Triple Helix Innovation) helps build regional innovation systems and its contingencies in China's emerging economy. A panel dataset from thirty provincial level regions in China from 2002 to 2011 indicates R&D investment from firms, universities and research institutes is an important driver of regional innovation systems. The effectiveness of R&D Investment is contingent on the interaction between local producers and users of knowledge. When the interaction between local producers and users of knowledge becomes increasingly active, R&D investment from firms, universities and research institutes has a stronger effect on the building of regional innovation system. Moreover, the interaction between local producers and users of knowledge has an inverted U-shaped relationship with the building of regional innovation systems. (C) 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据