4.6 Article

Who's who in the Kenai River Fishery SES: A streamlined method for stakeholder identification and investment analysis

期刊

MARINE POLICY
卷 71, 期 -, 页码 194-200

出版社

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2016.06.001

关键词

Fishery management; Stakeholders; Social-ecological systems; Salmon; Natural resource management; Scenario planning; Stakeholder Analysis

资金

  1. Alaska EPSCoR NSF award [OIA-1208927]
  2. State of Alaska
  3. Office of Integrative Activities
  4. Office Of The Director [1208927] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The Kenai River Fishery is a unique social-ecological system (SES) with nearly 50 federal, state, local, and nonprofit groups influencing its political, ecological, and social structure. While ecological data exists for this fishery, the complexity of its stakeholder relationships has not been investigated. Stakeholder interactions can directly influence how science is integrated into management decisions and therefore affect the adaptive capacity of SES, such as the Kenai River Fishery. Drawing from the existing stakeholder literature, this methods identifies and ranks the key SES stakeholders and describes their roles. This study approached the question of which stakeholders should be included in a future SES adaptive capacity study by (1) identifying the key stakeholders within the Kenai River Fishery, (2) ranking each stakeholder's investment within the fishery using eleven categories of interaction, and (3) using these eleven categories to characterize each stakeholder's role within the SES. The largest number of stakeholders fall into the secondary investment category, showing that a relatively small number of resource managers are interacting with a large number of diverse nonprofit organizations. The top ranking stakeholders in this study will be invited to attend participatory scenarios workshops that will build the foundation for a deeper scenarios-based analysis of SES adaptive capacity. (C) 2016 The Author. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.6
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据