4.8 Article

Brighter, More Stable; and Less Toxic: A Host-Guest Interaction-Aided Strategy for Fabricating Fluorescent Silica Nanoparticles and Applying Them in Bioimaging and Biosensing at the Cellular Level

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 19, 页码 16291-16298

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03034

关键词

fluorescent silica nanoparticles; cyclodextrin-fluorophore complexes; host-guest interactions; cell imaging; ratiometric sensing

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21775004, 21422501]
  2. Wanjiang Scholar program
  3. Foundation for Innovation Team of Bioanalytical Chemistry

向作者/读者索取更多资源

The exploration of fluorescent tools with distinguished optical properties and favorable biocompatibility is significant for biosensing and bioimaging. We herein present a host guest interactions aided strategy for fabricating fluorescent silica nanoparticles (FSNPs), which is enabled by cyclodextrin (CD) supermolecules. Compared with conventional FSNPs, the modified products (are named as fluorophore@CD@SNPs) possess several advantages. First, the incorporated fluorophores can thoroughly get rid of their intrinsic aggregation due to CD's inclusion effect, and the fluorescence intensity of the obtained fluorophore@CD@SNPs can enhance 48-67%. The fluorophores can then be well-fixed by the host CD molecules. As a result, the leak rates of the incorporated fluorophores are only 15-17%, which is about 3 times lower than that of conventional ones (42-48%). Notably, the as-prepared fluorophore@CD@SNPs show observable less cytotoxicity as compared with their conventional counterparts, probably due to the substantially decreased leakage of the incorporated fluorophores. Because of prominent properties and versatile fabrication, the proposed fluorophore@CD@SNPs not only possess better performances for cell-imaging but are competent for ratiometric sensing of pH value at living cell using (indicator-reference) integrative silica NPs.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据