4.8 Article

Novel CO2 Fluorescence Turn-On Quantification Based on a Dynamic AIE-Active Metal-Organic Framework

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 3, 页码 2868-2873

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.7b17793

关键词

CO2 fluorescence quantification; metal-organic frameworks; aggregation-induced emission; aggregation-caused quenching; visible turn-on sensor; J aggregates

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21401160, 21775136, 21771158, 21301149, 21276220]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of the Higher Education Institutions of Jiangsu Province [17KJB150039]
  3. 863 Program of China [2015AA021003]
  4. Jiangsu Collaborative Innovation Center for Ecological Building Materials and Environmental Protection Equipments [GX2015104, CP201502]
  5. Yancheng Institute of Technology [KJC2013001, KJC2014034]
  6. Key Laboratory for Advanced Technology in Environmental Protection of Jiangsu Province [AE201310, AE201312]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Traditional CO2 sensing technologies suffer from the disadvantages of being bulky and cross-sensitive to interferences such as CO and H2O, these issues could be properly tackled by innovating a novel fluorescence-based sensing technology. Metal organic frameworks (MOFs), which have been widely explored as versatile fluorescence sensors, are still at a standstill for aggregation-induced emission (AIE), and no example of MOFs showing a dynamic AIR activity has been reported yet. Herein, we report a novel MOF, which successfully converts the aggregation-caused quenching of the autologous ligand molecule to be AM-active upon framework construction and exhibits bright fluorescence in a highly viscous environment, resulting in the first example of MOFs exhibiting a real dynamic AIE activity. Furthermore, a linear CO2 fluorescence quantification for mixed gases in the concentration range of 2.5-100% was thus well-established. These results herald the understanding and advent of a new generation in all solid-state fluorescence fields.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据