4.8 Article

Sandwich-like Nanosystem for Simultaneous Removal of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) from Water and Soil

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 21, 页码 18316-18326

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b03379

关键词

FeS; carboxyl-functionalized ferroferric oxide; Cr(VI); Cd(II); remove

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21407151]
  2. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of Chinese Academy of Sciences [2015385]
  3. Chinese Academy of Sciences [KSZD-EW-Z-022-05]
  4. Science and Technology Service Programs of Chinese Academy of Sciences [KFJ-STS-ZDTP-002, KFJ-SW-STS-143]
  5. Science and Technology Major Project of Anhui Province [17030701051]
  6. Environmental Protection Department of Anhui Province [2017-04]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

In In this work, a novel nanosystem with a sandwich-like structure was synthesized via face-to-face combination of two pieces of waste cotton fabrics (CFs) carrying ferrous sulfide (FeS) and carboxyl-functionalized ferroferric oxide microsphere (CFFM), respectively, and the obtained nanosystem was named as FeS/CFFM/CF. Therein, FeS has high reduction and adsorption capabilities for hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)), CFFM possesses a high adsorption ability on cadmium ion (Cd(II)) through electrostatic attraction and chelation, and CF displays high immobilization ability for FeS and CFFM and adsorption performance on Cd(II). FeS/CFFM/CF could simultaneously remove Cr(VI) and Cd(II) from water and inhibit the uptake of Cr and Cd by fish and water spinach, ensuring the food safety. Besides, this technology could efficiently control the migration of Cr(VI) and Cd(II) in the sand-soil mixture, which was favorable to prevent their wide diffusion. Importantly, FeS/CFFM/CF possessed a high flexibility and could be conveniently produced with needed scale and shape and easily separated from water and soil, displaying a promising approach to remediate Cr(VI)-/Cd(II)contaminated water and soil and a huge application potential.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据