4.8 Article

Generalized Synthesis of Ternary Sulfide Hollow Structures with Enhanced Photocatalytic Performance for Degradation and Hydrogen Evolution

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 21, 页码 17911-17922

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b02955

关键词

ternary sulfide; hollow structures; gas bubble template; yolk-shell; photocatalytic activities

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21673300]
  2. Key Laboratory of Analytical Chemistry for Biology and Medicine (Wuhan University), Ministry of Education [ACBM2017003]
  3. Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2018CFB237]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

A series of ternary sulfide hollow structures have been successfully prepared by a facile glutathione (GSH)-assisted one-step hydrothermal route, where GSH acts as the source of sulfur and bubble template. We demonstrate the feasibility and versatility of this in situ gas-bubble template strategy by the fabrication of novel hollow structures of MIn2S4 (M = Cd, Zn, Ca, Mg, and Mn). Interestingly, with the reaction time varying, the hierarchical CdIn2S4 microspheres with controlled internal structures can be regulated from yolk shell, smaller yolk-shell (yolk shell with shrunk yolk), hollow, to solid. Under visible-light irradiation, all of our prepared CdIn2S4 samples with different morphologies were photoactivated. In virtue of the appealing hierarchical hollow structure, the yolk-shell-structured CdIn2S4 microspheres exhibited the optimal photocatalytic activity and excellent durability for both the X3B degradation and H-2 evolution, which can be ascribed to the synergy-promoting effect of the small crystallite size together with the unique structural advantages of the yolk-shell structure. Thus, we hypothesize that this proof-of-concept strategy paves an example of rational design of hollow structured ternary or multinary sulfides with superior photochemical performance, holding great potential for future multifunctional applications.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据