4.8 Article

Dual-Mechanism and Multimotion Soft Actuators Based on Commercial Plastic Film

期刊

ACS APPLIED MATERIALS & INTERFACES
卷 10, 期 17, 页码 15122-15128

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsami.8b00396

关键词

soft actuators; polyethylene; anisotropy; multiresponse; dual-mechanism

资金

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51672043, 61674028]
  2. Shanghai Natural Science Foundation [15ZR1401200, 16ZR1401500]
  3. Program for Professor of Special Appointment (Eastern Scholar) at Shanghai Institutions of Higher Learning
  4. Program of Shanghai Academic Research Leader [16XD1400100]
  5. Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality [16JC1400700]
  6. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission [2017-01-07-00-03-E00055]
  7. Program of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [111-2-04]
  8. Shanghai ChenGuang Program [15CG33]
  9. Shanghai Sailing Program [16YF1400400]
  10. Young Elite Scientists Sponsorship Program by CAST [2017QNRC001]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Soft actuators have attracted a lot of attention owing to their biomimetic performance. However, the development of soft actuators that are easily prepared from readily available raw materials, conveniently utilized, and cost-efficient is still a challenge. Here, we present a simple method to fabricate a polyethylene-based soft actuator. It has controllable anisotropic structure and can realize multiple motions, including bidirectional bending and twisting based on dual mechanisms, which is a rare phenomenon. Especially, the soft actuators can response at a very small temperature difference (Delta T > 2.3 degrees C); therefore, even skin touch can quickly drive the actuator, which greatly broadens its applications in daily life. The soft actuator could demonstrate a curvature up to 7.8 cm(-1) accompanied by powerful actuation. We have shown that it can lift an object 27 times its own weight. We also demonstrate the application of this actuator as intelligent mechanical devices.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据