4.7 Article

RADIATION-DRIVEN OUTFLOWS FROM AND RADIATIVE SUPPORT IN DUSTY TORI OF ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI

期刊

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
卷 825, 期 1, 页码 -

出版社

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/1/67

关键词

galaxies: active; galaxies: nuclei; hydrodynamics; methods: numerical; quasars: general; radiative transfer

资金

  1. NASA/ATP grants [NNX11AF49G, NNX14AB43G]
  2. Division Of Astronomical Sciences
  3. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien [1516299] Funding Source: National Science Foundation
  4. NASA [686815, NNX14AB43G, 146943, NNX11AF49G] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Substantial evidence points to dusty, geometrically thick tori obscuring the central engines of active galactic nuclei (AGNs), but so far no mechanism satisfactorily explains why cool dust in the torus remains in a puffy geometry. Near-Eddington infrared (IR) and ultraviolet (UV) luminosities coupled with high dust opacities at these frequencies suggest that radiation pressure on dust can play a significant role in shaping the torus. To explore the possible effects of radiation pressure, we perform three-dimensional radiative hydrodynamics simulations of an initially smooth torus. Our code solves the hydrodynamics equations, the time-dependent multi-angle group IR radiative transfer (RT) equation, and the time-independent UV RT equation. We find a highly dynamic situation. IR radiation is anisotropic, leaving primarily through the central hole. The torus inner surface exhibits a break in axisymmetry under the influence of radiation and differential rotation; clumping follows. In addition, UV radiation pressure on dust launches a strong wind along the inner surface; when scaled to realistic AGN parameters, this outflow travels at similar to 5000(M/10(7) M-circle dot)(1/4) [L-UV/(0.1 L-E)] km s(-1) and carries similar to 0.1 (M/10(7)M(circle dot))(3/4) [L-UV/0.1 L-E)](3/4) M-circle dot yr(-1), where M, L-UV, and L-E are the mass, UV luminosity, and Eddington luminosity of the central object respectively.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据