4.7 Article

Effect of Medium Supplements on Agrobacterium rhizogenes Mediated Hairy Root Induction from the Callus Tissues of Camellia sinensis var. sinensis

期刊

出版社

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijms17071132

关键词

Agrobacterium rhizogenes; antioxidants; browning; callus; hairy root; tea

资金

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31070614, 31370687]
  2. Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education [20123418110002]
  3. Anhui Major Demonstration Project for Leading Talent Team on Tea Chemistry and Health
  4. Twelfth Five-Year National Key Basic Research and Development Project (973) in China [2012CB722903]

向作者/读者索取更多资源

Tea (Camellia sinensis L.) is recalcitrant to Agrobacterium-mediated genetic transformation largely due to the bactericidal effects of tea polyphenols and phenolics oxidation induced by necrosis of explant tissue over the process of transformation. In this study, different antioxidants/adsorbents were added as supplements to the co-cultivation and post co-cultivation media to overcome these problems for the transformation improvement. Tea-cotyledon-derived calli were used as explants and Agrobacterium rhizognes strain ATCC 15834 was used as a mediator. Results showed that Agrobacterium growth, virulence (vir) gene expression and browning of explant tissue were greatly influenced by different supplements. Murashige and Skoog (MS) basal salts medium supplemented with 30 gL(-1) sucrose, 0.1 gL(-1) l-glutamine and 5 gL(-1) polyvinylpolypyrrolidone (PVPP) as co-cultivation and post co-cultivation media could maintain these parameters better that ultimately led to significant improvement of hairy root generation efficiency compared to that in the control (MS + 30 gL(-1) sucrose). Additionally, the reporter genes beta-glucuronidase (gusA) and cyan fluorescent protein (cfp) were also stably expressed in the transgenic hairy roots. Our study would be helpful in establishing a feasible approach for tea biological studies and genetic improvement of tea varieties.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.7
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据