4.8 Review

The Nature and Reactivity of Ferryl Heme in Compounds I and II

期刊

ACCOUNTS OF CHEMICAL RESEARCH
卷 51, 期 2, 页码 427-435

出版社

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.accounts.7b00463

关键词

-

资金

  1. Leverhulme Trust [F/00212/Q, RF-2016-135]
  2. BBSRC [BB/K015656/1, BB/N015940/1, BB/M018598/1, BB/C00602X/1, BB/C001184/1, 91/B19083]
  3. Wellcome Trust [WT094104MA]
  4. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council [BB/C00602X/1, BB/M018598/1, BB/K015656/1, BB/C001184/1, BB/N015940/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. BBSRC [BB/N015940/1, BB/K015656/1, BB/M018598/1] Funding Source: UKRI

向作者/读者索取更多资源

CONSPECTUS: Aerobicerobic organisms have evolved to activate oxygen from the atmosphere, which allows them to catalyze the oxidation of different kinds of substrates. This activation of oxygen is achieved by a metal center (usually iron or copper) buried within a metalloprotein. In the case of iron-containing heme enzymes, the activation of oxygen is achieved by formation of transient iron-oxo (ferryl) intermediates; these intermediates are called Compound I and Compound II. The Compound I and II intermediates were first discovered in the 1930s in horseradish peroxidase, and it is now known that these same species are used across the family of heme enzymes, which include all of the peroxidases, the heme catalases, the P450s, cytochrome c oxidase, and NO synthase. Many years have passed since the first observations, but establishing the chemical nature of these transient ferryl species remains a fundamental question that is relevant to the reactivity, and therefore the usefulness, of these species in biology. This Account summarizes experiments that were conceived and conducted at Leicester and presents our ideas on the chemical nature, stability, and reactivity of these ferryl heme species. We begin by briefly summarizing the early milestones in the field, from the 1940s and 1950s. We present comparisons between the nature and reactivity of the ferryl species in horseradish peroxidase, cytochrome c peroxidase, and ascorbate peroxidase; and we consider different modes of electron delivery to ferryl heme, from different substrates in different peroxidases. We address the question of whether the ferryl heme is best formulated as an (unprotonated) Fe-IV=O or as a (protonated) Fe-IV-OH species. A range of spectroscopic approaches (DUES, resonance Raman, Mossbauer, and EPR) have been used over many decades to examine this question, and in the last ten years, X-ray crystallography has also been employed. We describe how information from all of these studies has blended together to create an overall picture, and how the recent application of neutron crystallography has directly identified protonation states and has helped to clarify the precise nature of the ferryl heme in cytochrome c peroxidase and ascorbate peroxidase. We draw comparisons between the Compound I and Compound II species that we have observed in peroxidases with those found in other heme systems, notably the P450s, highlighting possible commonality across these heme ferryl systems. The identification of proton locations from neutron structures of these ferryl species opens the door for understanding the proton translocations that need to occur during O-O bond cleavage.

作者

我是这篇论文的作者
点击您的名字以认领此论文并将其添加到您的个人资料中。

评论

主要评分

4.8
评分不足

次要评分

新颖性
-
重要性
-
科学严谨性
-
评价这篇论文

推荐

暂无数据
暂无数据